Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Read In The Deep End By Kate Cann Free Online

Incineration, a real scandal HEALTH

by his friend Patrizia Gentilini, hematology / oncology and vice president of ISDE-Forlì Italy, and transmits the sense I get this note.
For those who do not know him, Professor Belpomme is the French doctor who on May 8, 2004 in Paris, during the international conference ARTAC ( Association for Research and Therapy of Cancer) on behalf of 76 other scientists (including Luc Montagnier) uttered the famous appeal of Paris:
... it has become necessary and urgent preventive approach pear damage health caused by chemical pollution: why the human species is in danger ... "

John Benefits (Contact for Umbria ISDE - Doctors for the Environment)


****************************** ************** **************** ***********************

The incenerime nt, a real scandal health.

Incineration of household waste is a method of treatment ordered by the scientific ternational. It indirectly confirms that the European Commission since the incineration reserve imento only to waste the last, ie once all the procedures for collection and selection of ricicalggio and reuse have been exhausted.
The incinerator Isséane d'Issy-les-Moulineaux, located on the outskirts of Paris, is a real health scandal. must be taken as an example of what not to do on this issue and our Italian friends should not make the same mistake , deceived by a lying propaganda. In fact, the incinerator Isséane is located in the basement, a few dozen meters from the banks of the Seine, and then in the middle of the wetland, resulting in pollution of the river due to the leaching process. It is also located right on the urban area, close to many homes, schools, kindergartens and hospitals, resulting in many children's exposure to dust and chemicals in the flue gas through the incinerator atmospheric circulation. Now, pregnant women and children are most vulnerable to all forms of pollution, including chemical.
Each incinerator must be imagined as a fireship [ed float laden with explosives intended to blow up or burn the enemy ships] giant emits many powders, especially fine particles (PM <2.5)>
To read the report in this regard "Statement of Evidence Particulate emission and Health. Ringaskiddy Proposed Waste-to-energy facility" in June 2009 of Professor C. Vyvyan Howard, one of British researchers who have signed the Appeal of Paris (Note 1).
Use filters and putting pursuant to dioxins is not really any effective protection against the thousands of CMR (carcinogenic, mutagenic and toxic for reproduction) emitting incinerators and of which, the article of Jay and Stieglitz (note 2), give a non-exhaustive list (note 3).
This explains the risk of cancer, leukemia, birth defects and reproductive disorders in proximity and at a distance from incinerators.
Incineration is also an absurd method on the environment because it increases the greenhouse effect by releasing water vapor and carbon dioxide. In addition, socio-economic terms, the cost of waste treatment is much higher compared to alternative methods .
In fact, as detailed in the report of GESDI (note 4), the only alternative methods, based on the collection and sorting, recycling of secondary materials (glass, paper, cardboard and metals), composting or methane fermentable organic waste, reuse of electrical and electronic compounds, lead to lower costs while creating jobs.
Incineration is therefore now become a total absurdity, the health, environmental and socio-economic and, finally, a real scandal.

Prof. Dominique Belpomme
Paris, November 5, 2009
ARTAC - Association pour la Recherche Therapeutique Anti-Cancéreuse